In message <4b006929.3010...@rubidium.dyndns.org>, Magnus Danielson writes:
>distance from the jammer until affected. It's a fairly well-understood >problem and the difference between civilian and military receivers lies >in signals, keying for access, bootstrapping and testing and >counter-measures such as IMU. Not to mention clocks: The more stable clock a GPS receiver has, the harder it is to jam it, because the "unspread bandwidth" can be much tighter. Somebody showed a specially tuned GPS receiver, clocked from Cs to be pretty much invulnerable to "randomised" jamming. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
