Hi My assumption is that that the same propagation effects that move the phase also delay the arrival of the modulation. The ID on WWVB is a 45 degree (?) carrier phase shift. At the very least, I think you would need to let the loop know about that.
I do hardware one week and software the next. Right now I'm writing a bunch of Perl .... Bob On Feb 8, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Bob Paddock wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Bob Camp <li...@cq.nu> wrote: > >> I assume that you are going to have to train your loop to "expect" the ID >> shifts and time >> markers. Again, they are predictable. > > Would it not be easier to use the WWVB Zero-Crossings to sync something? > Then the power shifts should not mater. > >> It's just software .... > > You must be a hardware person... :-) > > > > -- > http://www.wearablesmartsensors.com/ > http://www.softwaresafety.net/ > http://www.designer-iii.com/ > http://www.unusualresearch.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.