Hi

The gotcha here is that saturation / slew limiting is one of the few things 
that will give you *better* data than the oscillators are really doing. Most 
error sources have the "nice" property of making things worse. 

Bob


On Feb 27, 2010, at 6:40 PM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:

> The LT1037 is shown with a gain of ~1690x, if this amplifier is used to 
> amplify the beat frequency signal, it will saturate.
> Opamp recovery from saturation is poorly documented and may be very slow.
> It would be better to use some diodes in the amplifier feedback network to 
> limit the large signal gain to 5x (so that the LT1037 remains stable as it 
> isn't unity gain stable).
> This will ensure a somewhat faster recovery from overload as the LT1037 then 
> avoids saturation and the opamp input stage remains in the linear region.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> Bob Camp wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> Assuming that the junction of the back to back diodes goes trough a chunk of 
>> coax to get to the counter:
>> 
>> You are forming a low pass filter with the 10K resistor and the coax 
>> capacitance. The LT1037 is quite happy driving a 600 ohm load. You could 
>> easily drop the impedance at that point below 300 ohms. That should give you 
>> a faster edge into the counter.
>> 
>> You also should check the slew rate performance of the 1037. You don't want 
>> the op amp to be slew rate limited.
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>> 
>> On Feb 27, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Brian Kirby wrote:
>> 
>>   
>>> I am in the process of designing a DMTD system.  As an experiment to do 
>>> basic measurements on the chosen mixer, I used a capacitor (0.01 uF) in 
>>> series to ground with a 47 ohm metal film resistor.  Where the capacitor 
>>> and resistor meets, another resistor is attached (390 ohms) that goes to 
>>> ground.  The idea is to provide a 50 ohm termination at 20 Mhz and a 
>>> lighter termination at audio frequencies.  I seen this is a NBS note and I 
>>> can say, its a starting point for my experiments.
>>> 
>>> This (my) system is designed for 10 Mhz, using a 10 hertz beat.  A 
>>> schematic is attached of what I am experimenting with at the moment.  A 
>>> HP5370B is the recording instrument.  The noise floor from 1 days 
>>> observations show  2x10-11 at 0.1 seconds, 2x10-12 at 1 sec, 5x10-13 at 10 
>>> sec, 6x10-14 at 100 sec, 7x10-15 at 1000 sec, and 7x10-16 at 10,000 secs.   
>>> It will be interesting when the project is completed to see how much 
>>> improvement there will be.
>>> 
>>> As I understand (or learning..) mixer performance is the key to the DMTD 
>>> system.   It occurs to me that maybe a capacitor designed for 50 ohms at 20 
>>> mhz may be a better termination (for the IF port) for this mixer.  A 16 pF 
>>> capacitor is 50 ohms at 20 mhz, and for comparison at 10 hertz, it would be 
>>> 100 meg-ohms, which would give maximum amplitude at 10 hertz.   As I 
>>> understand, a capacitor terminated mixer will give a triangle wave output, 
>>> which is very beneficial to the design - as the end result is to get 
>>> maximum slope out of the mixer.  I would say, unqualified as I am, the 
>>> capacitor termination matches the 20 mhz signal, and helps attenuates the 
>>> harmonics of the mixer, and has no , or very little effect on the audio 
>>> frequencies that we are interested in.
>>> 
>>> And saying/rambling on... that if maximum slope is needed, its needed on 
>>> the 10 hertz beat signal - so maybe a capacitive termination on the 10 
>>> hertz signal only and something resistive on the 20 mhz 
>>> signal........another idea use the 16 pF direct off the mixer, then a 
>>> series resistor for isolation and then a large capacitor on the 10 hertz 
>>> beat for maximum slope.
>>> 
>>> At the present, I am awaiting parts to build a low noise preamp base on the 
>>> THAT1512 so I can make better measurements on the mixer.  Bruce has 
>>> provided a lot of good suggestions and helpful comments on my project and 
>>> Ulrich has provided me quite a bit of user support on his program, Plotter. 
>>>  Thanks to all.
>>> 
>>> Comments ?     Brian KD4FM
>>> <DMTD_Plans.pdf>_______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>     
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
>>   
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
> 


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to