Hi

Or just maybe you go into attack mode much to quickly, and thus shut down the 
conversation before it's ever really started.

Bob


On Mar 27, 2010, at 7:52 PM, WarrenS wrote:

> 
> Bob wrote:
>> EFC is essentially instantaneous at the "many seconds" level. There's not 
>> much settling left to do after 20 time constants.
> 
> ALL  mostly true, although I have not seen any TCs as long as 50 ms.
> EFC inputs on most Osc I've tested, including the 10811, are essentially 
> instantaneous at <100us TC. (BW > 2 KHz)
> 
> BUT
> I find it amazing how a few true statements of basic principal can be used to 
> counter the facts.
> I should of made it more clear, I was NOT talking about TC settling.
> The long "resettling" time of hrs I was referring to is of a similar effect 
> as turning the unit off for a while and then back on.
> I suppose that according to your book formula, that should only take 20 
> seconds also to come back to within 1e-12.
> Maybe the problem is that the Osc does not read the same books,
> OR maybe the problem is just that some of us are getting more performance 
> from them than they were ever designed to give,
> and at that level there are a few new unexpected and unknown secondary 
> effects.
> 
> ws
> 
> *******************
> Hi
> 
> On a properly working crystal oscillator, EFC is essentially instantaneous at 
> the "many seconds" level. The main delay you see is from the R/C time 
> constant between the R's in the tuning attenuator and any bypass C's that are 
> present. Time constants rarely get over 50 ms. Twenty * tau would only be 1 
> seconds at the 50 ms case. There's not much settling left to do after 20 time 
> constants.
> 
> Bob
> ******************
> WarrenS wrote:
> 
>> I should of also said; when care is taken, turning the Osc unit over is 
>> repeatable,
>> if just looking at a graph plot where the resolution is several parts in 
>> e-11.
>> 
>> Pete2
>> 
>> Addressing your first question only, I'll let the experts address the why.
>> 
>> Yes, I 'think' it does in principal, I would not guess on how long it takes 
>> though.
>> But
>> I have not checked that close to be sure.
>> I'd never do something that gross during the middle of a test that I was 
>> trying to see 1e-12 things.
>> I do that first thing, long before the high resolution test starts and then 
>> let things resettle before proceeding.
>> Any change in cable position or the Osc moving a bit in its Box or a dozen 
>> other things could also change
>> it that much, including temp gradients in the box, so Don't do that if you 
>> want 1e-12 results.
>> Use the wedge, that I have tested, and is completely reversible and 
>> repeatable at those levels.
>> 
>> I have noticed that the OSC will EVEN take a long time to RESETTLE  (HRS+ ) 
>> if the EFC voltage is change a lot and then put back.
>> Which is why I limit the clamp voltage of my Tbolt to typ + - 100 mv or less 
>> from its nominal.
>> 
>> ws
>> 
>> ********************
>> 
>>> Warren,
>>>   If you turn over an oscillator, is the frequency change
>>> completely reversible (to your "under 1e-12 resolution") when it is
>>> restored?  Thinking aloud, if an hour-glass is turned over twice, the
>>> final level will be the same, but the grains will be mixed.  A quartz
>>> crystal, however, is solid, so hopefully nothing actually moves.
>>> Presumably the zero-G axis is with the axis of oscillation at 90
>>> degrees to gravity?
>>> 
>>>   Peter (the "other" one :-)
>>> 
>> ***************************>
>>> 
>>>> Another thing I use it for is to test high resolution Freq meters.
>>>> Using a calibrated wedge that I can then slide under one edge of the zero-G
>>>> Osc box, I can
>>>> make small, variable, repeatable, freq changes of under 1e-12 resolution,
>>>> something pretty hard to do otherwise.
>>>> If I want to make BIG changes like 1e-10, I can rotate the box on any of 
>>>> its
>>>> sides and still use the wedge,
>>>> and for a quick check of new equipment, I just turn the box over which then
>>>> gives a couple of parts in 1e-9 freq change.
>>>> It makes a weird but simple and indispensable variable freq source that is
>>>> useful for many things, such as checking the LOOP TC of a TBolt.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
> 


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to