Interesting work. They measured the "before" and "after" signals with 2 very different oscilloscopes one with 100 MHz BW and one with 500 MHz, which they shouldn't trust.. I guess they only had 2 2-channel scopes in their lab.
Matt On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Magnus Danielson <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote: > Fellow time-nuts, > > Another article about GPS PPS tracking. Their twist to it has been to lower > the PPS jitter, not to create a locked 10 MHz clock. I though it may be > useful for someone at least: > > http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.129.8625&rep=rep1&type=pdf > > Cheers, > Magnus > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.