Le 25/06/2010 06:40, Steve Rooke a écrit :
...snip...
Perhaps more like yourself would express the same sentiment publicly
here, that may be the encouragement that Warren needs to take that
plunge. So please speak up and add your support to Warren. Thank you.
I'll add my vote. If we had a circuit and software, I for for one would
be interested in investing a few bucks to build it and enable me to
measure the stability of the oscillators I have. Leaving aside the
descent into a slanging match between Warren and others on the list old
enough to know better, I have to sympathize with Warren, as from the
comparisons done by John (many thanks for your work there John) Warrens'
approach is "good enough" for my purpose and probably for a large number
of readers here..
Heaven forbid that I start more mud slinging, but I think that Bruce did
not take enough notice of Warrens assertion that his method was "good
enough". There may be mathematical incompleteness in Warrens'
implementation and maybe his implementation does not enable measurement
of adev as defined in the literature, but the model is sufficiently
close that it not seem to influence the results in the tao range that
interests me.
Mike
Steve
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
