Bert, I'm using at the moment a thunderbolt (with spare for testpurposes using ext. other oscillators), a nice PRS10, a FRK-HLN-1A (5MHz with external doubler to 10 MHz) and several HP10811. I would like to build up with this a good and reliable reference (PPS and Frequ.). My dream would be a good autonom. TIC with timestamp possibility. At the moment the 53132A is doing a good job, but I miss the time stamp possibility and single measurements at defined time steps... regards Arnold,DK2WT
Am 29.07.2010 13:50, schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com: > Arnold > what do you use? Bert Kehren > > > In a message dated 7/29/2010 7:02:06 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > arnold.ti...@gmx.de writes: > > I do, and I am also interested on other improvements! > > Regards, > Arnold > > > Am 29.07.2010 12:49, schrieb ewkeh...@aol.com: >> Hi >> I think it would be nice to have a show of hands as to how many are > locking >> a Rb to GPS and what they use. >> Bert Kehren >> >> >> In a message dated 7/29/2010 4:00:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >> p...@phk.freebsd.dk writes: >> >> In message <60eb5e7c69594f49b830463dc322e...@athlon>, "Ulrich Bangert" > >> writes: >>>> Uhm, isn't this exactly where you want to use the >>>> still-smelling-like-brand-new-car PICTIC II with a good DAC >>>> and a microcontroller ? >>> >>> I guess the PICTIC II is not very good when stop pulses arrive BEFORE >> start >>> pulses which is a normal condition if a average time interval of zero >>> between local pps and GPS pps is the aim. >> >> So configure it to use a standard offset of one Xtal/Rb period ? >> >> > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
