On Aug 19, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Didier Juges wrote: > Well, you need another reference that does not use the same principles to > check your first reference against. > > That one worked for me.
Ooooh, good one! > Now I am working on the next one, because "a man with two clocks..." "...needs a third one to cancel out systematic errors?" Or how about "Chicks dig guys with stable frequency and time references". :-) -- Mark J. Blair, NF6X <n...@nf6x.net> Web page: http://www.nf6x.net/ GnuPG public key available from my web page. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
