Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 02:16, jimlux <jim...@earthlink.net> wrote:
Mark J. Blair wrote:
On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:30 AM, jimlux wrote:
Yes.. except that the cable's physical and electrical length *do* vary with
temperature, so if you're looking at the gnat's eyelash sort of thing, you
need to take that into account. Maybe 10 ppm/degree, so a 20 meter run will
change a bit less than a millimeter. That's down in the fractional
picoseconds time-wise.
It's an issue if you're doing things like interferometry at higher
frequencies..
Would be possible for the receiver to take into account automatically
the delay of the antenna cable, by measuring the delay of an echo of
a signal it sends towards the antenna? Do such receivers exists?
Not for GPS, to my knowledge, but in other time distribution systems,
certainly. It's also used in antenna ranges when you need phase
information (as in a near field range). It's also been done "over the
air" in radio telescope arrays (e.g. VLA).
At JPL, we navigate spacecraft in deep space by very accurately
measuring the time delay of a round trip to the spacecraft from earth
and back. These days, position uncertainties are in the cm range and
velocity in the mm/s, implying measurements of picoseconds in a round
trip time of 10,000 seconds. All of this implies that the entire
measurement chain (including the cables carrying the maser reference
signal) are carefully characterized and controlled.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
