On 10/29/2010 08:28 PM, WarrenS wrote:
If it is time to come back from all the "Dead" subjects, I have a time
nut question.

What is the correct 100 sec Allan value of this low noise 10811 Osc? All
plots are of the same OSC, just different parts of the same data run.

None of them is correct, but the Overlapping 0K-563K curve is closest to the real curve, if only drift is compensated for. However, for the run you have here, drift does not dominate so no real drift needs to be compensated.

What you have is typical and really shows that the statistical confidence bounds can be very bad for longer taus using the Allan variance estimator... even the overlapping one.

The relative closeness of the various curves up to about 1 second comes from the richness of observables, or high degree of freedom. As the tau becomes higher the degrees of freedom falls like a stone and the statistical confidence intervals just blows out.

There is two basic cures for this, more data, better estimator or better yet, both.

The research for better estimators is motivated by the need to improve the quality (confidence intervals) without having very long measurement series. The overlapping estimator is really the first step of improvement of estimator, but certainly not the last. Modern estimators such as the Theo variants cranks out more degrees of freedom from the same sequence of samples and thus will have better confidence intervals and this moves the point where the confidence intervals blows up to higher taus, but it will happen eventually.

So, of the measures you have, the full-length overlapping is the best in that set.

I had to read up a lot when I put some time on getting the Wikipedia article on Allan Variance into better shape. It was darn good exercise. I still have a few aspects to cover in that article, but I haven't had the time.

Cheers,
Magnus

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to