I would say that our perception of the three dimensions is an artifact of the hologram. The world looks nothing like it appears to us as part of the hologram. Think of how we view holographic film vs how the film's contents appears when properly set up so that we can see the hologram.
-Chuck Harris gandal...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 30/10/2010 12:12:36 GMT Daylight Time, sar10...@gmail.com writes: So if everything is in 2d then nothing has mass as we need volume, hence a third dimension, for mass surely. If nothing has mass then it should be possible to travel faster than the speed of light. In a 2d universe, a lot of the basic laws of physics, we hold dear, just break, don't they? ------------- There is another consideration, if we assume the third dimension to be the Z axis, just for example doesn't really matter which, and that is taken to be the "depth" of our perception, simple rotation interchanges that with either the X or Y axis. Nothing very profound in that but which one in our "reality" are we going to treat as non-existent, or is this just to be conveniently explained away as an artefact of holography? regards Nigel GM8PZR _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
