On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 17:04, Julien Goodwin > <time-n...@studio442.com.au> wrote: >> On 19/01/11 02:35, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: >>> Though this could be of interest... >>> >>> http://www.insidegnss.com/node/2446 >> >> "The SA.45s reportedly provides ... short-term stability (Allan >> Deviation) of 2E-10 @ 1 sec, long-term aging of 3E-10/month" >> >> From the data sheet of the bigger Rubidium micro-clocks: >> >> SA.33/35m: >> 1 Sec stability- <3E-11 >> 1 month aging - +/1 1E-10 >> >> Neat, but only really of benefit to *really* space/weight/power critical >> devices. > > Also for low cost applications, I think. > > It says 1500 USD for low volume. And surely the price is going to > decrease in the near future? > > Cheers > P.
If history repeats. Look up what the first GPS units cost, or that HP 5060A cost adjusted for inflation ! Now lets hope some cell company will use them and a couple years from now they will be $100. Curious what was the real price of a Thunderbolt from the factory ? -pete _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.