Indeed those posts are from 2003 the car plant could be closed these days. But I do indeed receive wwvb I think pretty well with a loop and preamp. Its always been a challenge on the east coast and even Michigan when I first started tinkering way to many years ago. Pretty much before all these switching power supplies and cpfls etc. Regards
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > > bro...@pacific.net said: > > John Mills (THE NTP guru) has written a number of papers on and built > > examples of a matched filter type receiver for the HF station WWV, but > the > > ideas would also be applicable to a WWVB receiver. The performance he > gets > > from WWV would knock your socks off so I expect a WWVB version would be > > even better. In addition there are some things that could be done to > > improve it. > > I assume you mean Dave Mills rather than John. > http://www.ece.udel.edu/~mills/index.html > > He's basically given up on WWVB. In his area, there is too much crap > around > 60 KHz, mostly from switching power supplies. > http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2003-August/000106.html > http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2006-April/009958.html > > > > -- > These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.