Hi:

I've used the HP 8566B in a mixer test system where I wrote the software to control it and the two synthesized microwave signal generators. The performance was outstanding. Studied the 70000 series SA system and it would be faster if you were searching for a non harmonically related spur.

Of course the modern digital SAs like the HP 4395A and the HP 4396B may be faster for some searches and have true 1 Hz RBW.
http://www.prc68.com/I/4395A.shtml

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.End2PartyGovernment.com/


ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:
As I said before it is even by today's standards an excellent analyzer and
I am sure there are people out there for that reason willing to pay the
money  for a LCD display.
Bert Kehren


In a message dated 9/26/2011 10:56:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
n...@verizon.net writes:

The kit costs more than the analyzer.
If someone finds a good LCD panel and does the mechanical design  for
mounting I can begin work on an "open source" design for  the
electronics part.
That would expand the  market to far more of us.


On 09/26/11,  shali...@gmail.com wrote:
There are aftermarket color LCD  replacement available for the HP 8566
and HP 8568 analyzers,  either as a do-it-yourself kit, or as a turn-key
service.
Didier KO4BB
Sent from my BlackBerry  Wireless thingy while I do other things...
-----Original  Message-----
From: [1]ewkeh...@aol.com
Sender:  [2]time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011  07:01:36
To:<[3]time-nuts@febo.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
<[4]time-nuts@febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Any  thoughts on best rubidium?
Roy,
for its time  it was the best because of the spectral purity of its Osc.
The
big problem with the unit today is its CRT. Limited life  and no
replacements. As rare as Cs tubes. If you can live with  1.3 GHz an
excellent choice,
the 22 GHz  version because of source does not have as good
specifications.Also repairable, many parts are readily  available.
Bert Kehren
In a message dated  9/26/2011 6:27:59 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[5]phill...@btinternet.com writes:
Bert
What's  your opinion of the "old" HP8568B with its max. frequency  range
of
1.3 Ghz and its weight of around 100  lbs. - are the more recent
instruments
that  much better ?
Roy
--------------------------------------------------
From:<[6]ewkeh...@aol.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011  10:47 AM
To:<[7]time-nuts@febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Any thoughts on best rubidium?
  If you want low noise in a spectrum analyzer it all comes down to  the
signal quality into the first mixer. Every thing else  with today's
technology
is down  hill.
Bert Kehren


In a message dated 9/25/2011 5:32:31 A.M. Eastern  Daylight Time,
[8]rob...@delien.nl  writes:

One other thing is that  some spectrum analyzers aren't really
designed
for low noise performance. Since the noise floor is often  pretty
high,
the design of the whole  RF chain (e.g. spur levels and such) might
have
assumed that lots of things would be hidden in  the grass.
True, it's one of the  many selection criterions for selecting the
instrument  that meets your needs.
I've been looking a the luggable  HP series 859x and 856x, preferring
the
  latter because they have a PLL YIG whereas the fist uses a
free-running
oscillator. But these machines are old, 80's  and 90's, pricey, and
not
  really
THAT good. Add decent range (up to 9GHz to see  recent 5.8GHz devices)
and
  a
tracking generator and before you know it, you'll be  paying $6k or
more
for
a 20 year old instrument.

  If the
analyzer is of the recent "bring a band of RF  down to an IF, sample
and
FFT it for  fine resolution" architecture, such things as the number
of
bits in the ADC and the "cleanliness" of the  sampling clock might
have
been chosen  based upon doing 1024 point transforms being displayed
with
100dB dynamic range (10dB/div and 10  divisions).
Most modern instruments  do that, at least to some degree. My R&S goes
  down
to a RBW of 10Hz by just mixing. Additionally RBWs  of 5, 3, 2 and 1Hz
are
achieve by  additional FFT. This instrument dates from 2001, but I
don't
think more recent instruments can achieve a  mixing-only RBW of 5Hz or
below.

(not to mention the spectrum analyzer actually  generating spurious
signals. I ran across that one  last year and thought I had an
interference source,  but, no, went back and checked the spec sheet
and
it said spurious are<-80dBc, and sure enough,  there it was at -82
dBc.
And stories  about the first LO coming back out through the input are
legion.)
Gee, I wish I had  consulted this group BEFORE buying my instrument.
I'm
happy with it and I don't regret anything, but you  could have added a
lot
more arguments in  favor or againstA-c-AEURA|
  _______________________________________________
time-nuts  mailing list -- [9]time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go  to
  [10]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
  _______________________________________________
time-nuts  mailing list -- [11]time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go  to
  [12]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts  mailing list -- [13]time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go  to
[14]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts  mailing list -- [15]time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go  to
[16]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts  mailing list -- [17]time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go  to
[18]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

References

1.  mailto:ewkeh...@aol.com
2.  mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
3.  mailto:time-nuts@febo.com
4.  mailto:time-nuts@febo.com
5.  mailto:phill...@btinternet.com
6.  mailto:ewkeh...@aol.com
7.  mailto:time-nuts@febo.com
8.  mailto:rob...@delien.nl
9. mailto:time-nuts@febo.com
10. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
11.  mailto:time-nuts@febo.com
12.  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
13.  mailto:time-nuts@febo.com
14.  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
15.  mailto:time-nuts@febo.com
16.  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
17.  mailto:time-nuts@febo.com
18.  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
_______________________________________________
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to