On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:21:31 -0700 "Tom Van Baak" <t...@leapsecond.com> wrote:
> I suspect the u-blox units are more concerned with quick > acquisition time and urban coverage than they are with > nanoseconds, but if someone knows for sure, please tell. That's also my impression. It was only after i had a longer discussion with one of the user support guys about the exact specs of the 6T that they measured and provided a document with more than just "we have 12ns jitter". Though the document is still not what i expect, it's infinitely better than before. Unfortunately, any questions that went more into the details (like is it possible to replace the TCXO with an external OCXO and where would you connect it?) were left unanswered. But, IMHO it's not that uBlox doesn't care about high precsion timing, but rather that they do not have any time-nut working for them, who could guide them into the right direction. Attila Kinali -- Why does it take years to find the answers to the questions one should have asked long ago? _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.