On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 6:08 PM, paul swed <paulsw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Right but they have that ability and its not good enough. > The alternative was to
It may very likely be good enough. Lots of people think they got it right. They either have a 60nS timing error which would be huge even for many home labs or neutrinos really are fast The goal now is to prove that it's right, or not. The 60nS anomaly may very well be a fact of nature. My guess is that the path length for neutrinos is shorter than the path length for photons. Or should I say the "path length when projected onto there dimensions" is shorter. Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
