On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:12:43 -0500
Chuck Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is nothing inherent in temperature correcting a clock
> that should take significantly more power than would be used
> in a normal watch chip. Measuring the temperature would be
> the most power hungry operation, I would suspect... but
> fortunately that doesn't have to be done all that often,
> perhaps once per minute.
Juup, it definitly should not draw much power.
I own a Tissot T-Touch (first gen) that goes wrong
less than 5s/y, ie it's definitly temperature compensated.
Battery lifetime is several years (i actually dont know
because i had to bring it back for repairs in shorter intervals
than the battery holds)
Attila Kinali
--
Why does it take years to find the answers to
the questions one should have asked long ago?
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
