When I said "on steroids" I meant a scheme similar to NTP, but something run by
the wireless companies themselves, not run of the mill NTP.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Albertson <albertson.ch...@gmail.com>
Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:54:34
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement<time-nuts@febo.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
<time-nuts@febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] NTP on steroid (was: a hijacked thread)
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Attila Kinali <att...@kinali.ch> wrote:
> The best you can get out of NTP is about 1ms. While UMTS needs something
> in the us range for proper working IIRC.
My NTP server runs at about 2 or 3 uSec level. It is nothing special.
Just an $85 Atom board running Linux and a $15 Oncore GPS. With
effort I could do twice as good.
But if you are talking about Windows PCs using the network to sync to
a server then , yes 1MS is very good. 10MS is typical
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
