Magnus,
How do they compare in price to the receivers we normally use for timing?
Do you see any advantage for a timing receiver to fix faster than once per
second?
Didier KO4BB
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I do other things...
-----Original Message-----
From: Magnus Danielson <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org>
Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:39
To: <time-nuts@febo.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
<time-nuts@febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Building a GPSDO & trouble using Jupiter-T
On 31/01/12 03:17, Didier Juges wrote:
> You have to spend good money to get a GPS receiver capable of calculating
> it's time and/or position more than once per second. I am not aware of that
> being done for timing applications, but it is available for navigation GPS
> receivers, such as those used to track race cars (for a race car, one
> second is an eternity). I have seen navigation receivers capable of 10
> fixes/second, I am sure there are better ones yet. They cost a lot of money.
I have receivers which can run navigation solutions up to 10 times per
second and raw-data results up to 50 times per second, I just don't have
that neat options in it. Ah well. Double-frequency never the less.
Cheers,
Magnus
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
