IMO, the place you really need >2-4 channels is logic analyzers, not 'scopes.
YMMV, -John ================ > On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT) > "J. Forster" <j...@quikus.com> wrote: > >> I would actually like to know why many seem to feel that a 500 MHz >> analog >> 'scope is not "good enough" for what you really do in your lab? > > Well... if i had a 500MHz analog scope, i wouldnt want anything better.. > ok, well maybe the storage function of DSO's is nice, but other than > that, i don't need much more and for home use i'd be happy with a 500MHz > analog... but, the only scope i have is a 2 channel 50MHz one. I definitly > could have a use for two more channels and a bit of more bandwidth. > The rest is nice to have. > > Attila Kinali > > -- > Why does it take years to find the answers to > the questions one should have asked long ago? > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
