On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Attila Kinali <att...@kinali.ch> wrote: > On Mon, 07 May 2012 08:20:55 -0700 > Dan Rae <dan...@verizon.net> wrote: > >> I see nothing odd about wanting to get the best possible source for the >> Master Clock for your master recordings.
You are right about that. But there are better clocks at 1/10th of the price. Also in a recording studio, many times you need to phase lock to an existing source and you do NOT want to be dead-on to some specific frequency. Jitter matters more then being frequency accurate. And end use would never hear a 1E-6 absolute frequency error, and I mean "never". But relative frequency errors and jitter is audible As for audiophool's home playback systems there is no need at all for an Rb clock. They would do much better with an $50 OCXO in a box. Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
