Yes, interesting, now I realize... but: >the larger the deviation becomes and lower frequency it will have... and both makes it >harder to suppress by filtering. Filtering at what level? Lengthen the sampling time? The average build up? That is, now I'm not aware and think that I have to correct as slowly as possible because I think that the oscillator has to be disturbed to a minimum. Then I see low frequency large deviations, so I think, OK, I have to average longer to account for. Is this the filtering you are referring to? So that one ends up increasing the slowness of the system getting only very slow frequency very large deviations. Thanks for the help
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Magnus Danielson < mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote: > Hi Azelio, > > On 05/07/2012 10:13 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote: > >> OK, got it. Yes, something like the dithering with a DAC to increase the >> resolution. >> > > Indeed. Now, consider now that the variations can come from any form of > noise source. > > Another thing I've learned is that the longer you wait with a correction, > the larger the deviation becomes and lower frequency it will have... and > both makes it harder to suppress by filtering. It's really just the same > thing form another angle. > > Cheers, > Magnus > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.