Hi True on the volume and weight. Not as much power as an OCXO since it's passive. At 1x 2 x 0.5 you could fix the power and weight by using an EMXO. You still would have more power than the TCXO, but no were near as much as the couple watts a USO uses.
Bob Bob On Sep 1, 2012, at 10:41 PM, Jim Lux <jim...@earthlink.net> wrote: > On 9/1/12 11:00 AM, Bob Camp wrote: >> Hi >> >> I suspect that a good IT cut would probably do better than an SC in either >> application. In the deep space situation, a copper slug in a dewar sounds >> like a reasonable addition to the design. >> > > If you're going to do dewars, then you're talking USOs for which the > technology is quite well developed with ovens, etc. > > But that's a kilo, several watts, and a liter. > > What you want is something that is better than, say, 0.1 ppm, that is > comparable in mass/power/volume/cost to an existing 1-5 ppm TCXO (about > 1x2x0.5 cm) > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
