Hal Murray wrote:
d...@montana.com said:
Michael: Actually implementing a 16 bit DAC to its 1-bit minimum resolution
will be headache enough. You will gain a real education in good grounding
practice, shielding, power supply stability and noise, and other Murphy
intrusion. A 32 bit DAC IMHO, is impossible, and that's the name of that
tune.
The trick for this application is that you don't need full accuracy over the
full range of the DAC. All you need is roughly linear and stable around the
operating point. The PLL will take care of any offset. Any gain error is
just a minor change to the overall gain.
This thread started with "16 bit PWM DAC". I think that matches the
requirements.
I would expect a problem area would be filtering the PWM output. Anything
you don't filter out will turn into close in spikes. It might be fun to try
to measure them.
64K/72 MHz is about 1 ms. 32bits at 72 MHz is 60 seconds.
Has anybody compared DDS style DACs with PWM? The idea is to spread the
pulses out to make the filtering easier. Instead of 1111100000, you would
get to work with 1010101010
Using a synchronous filter for the PWM DAC eases the additional
filtering required considerably.
24 bit resolution is readily achieved by combining the outputs of a pair
of PWM sources sharing a single synchronous filter.
Bruce
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
