-------- In message <camqqfunudahc9rdrk0g8hxo_kohs+bndeilnqspq1_b2nqk...@mail.gmail.com> , Didier Juges writes:
>I do not understand how anyone can guaranty no missing codes when the lower >11 bits are essentially noise? (31 bits resolution versus 20 effective bits) No missing codes is guaranteed by the design, you'd have to screw up the digital filters to come out with missing codes. That's not impossible to do, but the fix is simple: sufficient precision in the filters, hence the 31 bits. The 32nd bit is an overrange bit btw, if it tracks the sign bit you're fine, if it is inversed you are out of range. Smart detail. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.