Hi

All the stability and likely 20 to 30 db better phase noise. Probably 40 to 60 
db better spurs / crud. 

Bob

On Mar 26, 2013, at 12:31 PM, "Stan, W1LE" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I should of been clearer, Thanks for your comments.
> 
> final configuration is:
> 
> OCXO as a 10 MHz reference to the 106.5 MHz PLL then the DB6NT multiplier 
> chain for the LO.
> 
> All of the stability I need for a contest weekend.
> 
> Stan, W1LE
> 
> 
> On 3/26/2013 1:21 AM, Rex wrote:
>> Please tell us if I am parsing the content of your message correctly with my 
>> inserted comments.
>> 
>> On 3/25/2013 9:09 AM, Stan, W1LE wrote:
>>> Hello Dave,
>>> 
>>> The problem I experienced with a Rb at 10 MHz stabilizing a AD6IW PLL at 
>>> 106.5 MHz
>>> for a DB6NT 10 GHz G2 transverter,
>> I assume by "stabilizing" you mean that the rubidium was providing the 
>> reference frequency to the PLL.
>> 
>>> was the significant microphonics after multiplication.
>>> The original xtal oscillator did not have microphonics, but would drift.
>>> 
>>> My solution was to add a ISO-Temp 10 MHz OCXO as  a reference to the PLL.
>> By "add" I think you mean replace, as in, the rubidium is no longer used but 
>> the OCXO has replaced it as the PLL's reference. If you really meant add, 
>> that would imply that somehow the rubidium is disciplining the 10 MHz OCXO.
>> 
>>> This provided me with the frequency accuracy and stability
>>> needed for a weekend of microwave contesting, USB/CW
>>> 
>>> My 10 GHz operation is portable and I rove.
>>> 
>>> Stan, W1LE    Cape Cod   FN41sr
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3/25/2013 10:17 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>>> I'm possibly looking for a 40 MHz source and I know some of the
>>>> rubidiums are programmable. But can any of the affordable ones be
>>>> programmed to work at 40.0 MHz?
>>>> 
>>>> I was looking for a source to drive this 144 MHz -> 10 GHz transceiver.
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.chris-bartram.co.uk/products.html
>>>> 
>>>> The TCXO oscillator is off the board and a separate item, but costs
>>>> £40 and then one ideally wants to lock that to a more precise source.
>>>> The oscillator will lock to an external 10 MHz source, but then one
>>>> needs to buy both a 10 MHz rubidium as well as this 40 MHz TCXO. Hence
>>>> I was wondering if there was a cheaper more compact solution, which
>>>> just used a rubidium, and dispensed with a TCXO.
>>>> 
>>>> Dave
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to