In message <A687BF7F4A1642E8BA7EDDA7432A3969@pc52>, "Tom Van Baak" writes:
>When you look at the actual clock solutions (which are in the @@Hn >message) you will be surprised at the variance. A lot of that variance is because the position-hold coords are wrong. I tried using the @@Hn data to "sneak" up on the right coords and got some pretty good results, but the process too forever (as in: Months) See: http://phk.freebsd.dk/raga/sneak/ The improvement in the finished timing solution from the oncore is quite marginel because on average you have satellites on all sides of your antenna and the errors mostly cancel out. The notable exception to that is where I live: at 56N. 56N is at the top of the GPS orbits, so satellites never venture north of me, and I'm not sufficient north to have any benefits from the satellites which rise above Canada/Alask on the other side of the north pole. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.