I fully agree with Chris, do not trust Google Earth for any serious technical use, I found errors in 100-200 m range. You only need to check where two images are stitched. Google Earth images are not produced by Google, they get them from other companies or government bodies involved in making geographical information, I can't speak about it in a whole but I actually know cases in what Google tried to get the info for free. The metric quality (or QUALITY) is not controlled by Google as far as I know. Think of Google Earth as a means of providing geographical information for the layman, for finding places, advertising and so but you don't know how accurate it is, even the date of the images can be erroneous, you can verify this yourself. I had professionally advised many customers to not rely on this info for any serious use, giving them actual examples. It is a very good and amazing product but its goal is not to make any precise measurement, and the GPS antenna position determination is in fact a surveying task.

Regards,
Ignacio EB4APL



On 02/05/2013 17:19, Chris Albertson wrote:
Google maps is NOT that good, it can be off by a lot, tens of meters.

I had to have my property line surveyed some years ago to get a city
building permit. So now I have two brass markers at know position.
The survey crew used traditional transits from a brass benchmark.
Google Earth thinks these brass markers are a few meters from here the
survey crew said. (Yes I know about WGS84, we are all working in that
system)

I think the problem is that the lland is not flat here.   If I lived
in Kanas the Google system might work.   But I don't think Google
warps the images to account for hills and even slopes.  I don't know
the source of Google's error.  The 1 Sigma on the self survey is about
.5 meters more or less.

I think the best why to measure is to let the self survey run for a
full 24  hours so you get two full orbital periods of each satellite.
And also to  make sure you have 360 degree view of the sky.    I think
a view in only one direction might be biased.

But yu can check Google.  Find a few brass government benchmarks near
your house and have Google locate them and if you got a match go with
Google

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Stewart Cobb <stewart.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
A GPSDO typically makes the assumption that the position of its antenna is
fixed and well-known. That removes position uncertainty from the navigation
equations, and allows all the "information" from the satellite measurements
to be used to improve the time estimate. Errors in this position create
errors in timing, with a magnitude scaled by the speed of light (one ns per
foot, three ns per meter).

Most GPSDOs do some sort of position averaging when they are first turned
on, to come up with a good-enough estimate of antenna position. For a true
time-nut, that might not be good enough.

GPS surveying equipment can easily determine the position of your antenna
to within a few centimeters (~20 ps). Unfortunately, such equipment is
expensive and difficult to borrow.

A high-end GPSDO designed today should have the ability to record phase
data into RINEX files, which could be sent to a service like OPUS to find
the antenna position.

<http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/opus/>

But few do, so far.

The next best idea is to locate your antenna on Google Maps. Type in the
self-surveyed position to the Google search box, either as decimal degrees
or as DMS, formatted like this but without the quote marks:

"37.384542, -122.005526"

"37 23 4.35, -122 0 19.89"

Click on the map and zoom in. Click on the "Map" box in the upper right and
uncheck the "45 degree view" icon. Then right-click on the spot on the
picture where your antenna is actually located, and select "What's here?"
from the pop-up menu. A green arrow marker will appear, pointing to your
antenna. Left-click on the arrow, and read your latitude and longitude in
both formats. Enter one of them into your GPSDO, replacing the self-survey,
and enjoy increased accuracy.

A true time-nut will take one more step to improve accuracy. (Sorry, but
the rest of this is specific to North America. Similar details apply to
other parts of the world, but I only know the recipe for the place I live.)

Google Maps photos are registered (quite accurately) to the North American
Datum "NAD83". Unfortunately, your GPSDO operates in a different datum
known variously as WGS84, ITRF, or IGS (these are all essentially the
same). The difference between these two datums can be a couple of meters,
easily visible on the map photos and worth 5 ns or more of time error.
Fortunately, you can convert NAD83 to ITRF2008 at this website:

<http://www.geod.nrcan.gc.ca/apps/tmobs/tmobs_e.php>

For "ITRF epoch", just enter today's date. For "ellipsoidal height", use
the value from your self-survey if you don't have a better one. You might
be able to get a better one from Google Earth, or by finding a nearby
benchmark from this site (US only) and extrapolating to your antenna
location.

<http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/ds_radius.prl>

Note that the WGS84 ellipsoid is tens of meters higher than sea level
through most of North America, so if you live near the ocean, your
"ellipsoidal height" will probably be negative.

Hope someone find this useful.

Cheers!
--Stu
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to