Hi Perry, I was browsing a 1988 HP catalogue tonight..
The 8566B came in at a cool 62 thousand dollars new.
Wow!


-marki

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf 
Of Perry Sandeen
Sent: Friday, 14 June 2013 2:48 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] HP and other equipment failure



All,  
 
There has been an on and off discussion of equipment failure so I’d thought I’d 
add my experience.
 
First I’ve been repairing HP equipment since 1976 before many of you were born.
 
I now have over 16 pieces of HP test equipment and several units now need 
repair.
 
In my experience, the vast amount of failures are electrolytic caps with some 
aggravated by heat.
 
Someone floated the notion of not repairing HP equipment but cannibalizing it 
for parts.
 
Please bear with me on my long story.
 
After WWII there were all sorts of surplus stores selling everything in the 
mid-fifties.  I even remember an add in popular Mechanics magazine for a Norden 
bombsite for $29.95.  Much of my allowance was spent on mysterious wonders like 
a IFF receiver.  Hams reveled in B-29 prop pitch motors for rotating beam 
antennas.  Since it was 28 volt stuff it was far, far cheaper than commercial 
equivalents.
 
Then it all gradually disappeared.  Now people want $75 or more for a cruddy
ARC-5 receiver.
 
 Now this is
how it applies to us today.
 
If one peruses the Ebay adds for HP test equipment one frequently sees a 
statement like *removed from a place that went out of
business* or something similar.
 
True, the equipment we are buying is 20 years old or older.  But it is going 
away never to return.  I saw an old Ebay invoice from
12 years ago where I won a working HP 3586B for $50.  The shipping cost me 
more!  Now a non-functional unit sells for $400.
 
These prices are only going to continue to rise as the supply continues to 
diminish.
 
But this equipment is repairable unlike the questionable test equipment from 
China.  Doing preventative maintenance on this equipment is not optional if you 
want it to continue working.  All electrolytic caps should be replaced, except 
for tantalums.  That will be more on a case by case business.
 
This is equipment you can repair.  This is not very true for the newer stuff.
 
On the HP 3586B for example, there are a dozen or so of TVA atoms.  When I do 
mine I expect it will then lock below 500 KHz as it is specified.  The HP 5370B 
needs far more cooling than provided.  I have even given thought to adding 
additional resistances to the pass transistor collectors on the outside by the 
heat sink.  I found on my two that the mother board was scorched from 
overheating by rectifier diodes.  This will have to wait until after we have 
moved.  I will also add EFC to the 10811 oscillator.

(Why that feature was omitted can be answered by Ric).  
 
There are two long standing truths about electronic equipment.  One you can’t 
have too much filter capacitance.  Two, you can’t cool too much.  (Please spare 
me the  liquid nitrogen or submarine battery
comments.)
 
Regards,

Perrier


________________________________
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to