I have heard MSF on 60kHz in our early evening on some winter nights but never would describe it as jamming :-)
I have also heard YVTO on 5MHz underneath both WWV and WWVH, strangely off-kilter by half a second or so. Many evenings the Russian time stations are audible, offset by 4kHz from 5 and 10MHz. All that said, BPSK sounds like it could be substantially more robust than on/mostly-off keying. I'm surprised given how enthusiastic WWVB was to drop continuous-phase transmissions, that nobody's bought into it yet. Tim N3QE On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Brian Alsop <als...@nc.rr.com> wrote: > Apparently this modulation scheme is less prone to "jammers". > There is is British station which "jams" east coast WWVB. > > Brian/K3KO > > > On 7/3/2013 18:00, Tim Shoppa wrote: > > Potentially the BPSK encoding ought to offer much better decoding here on >> the East Coast of US. Many of the commercially available, pre-BPSK WWVB >> consumer clocks didn't sync so well in the summertime due to high noise >> levels. >> >> Tim N3QE >> > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2242 / Virus Database: 3204/5961 - Release Date: 07/03/13 > > > ______________________________**_________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/** > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts> > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
