Hi If we are keeping this stuff running for decades (think of the WWII stuff we still try to use) then we need a long term / across the board fix. Making all the vendors open source their firmware is one way, I doubt it will work. Reverse engineering all the firmware is also unlikely to be an across the board solution. The only real way I see is to adapt to it.
Bob On Aug 11, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > > als...@nc.rr.com said: >> Is the change cumulative? In other words is one tries 2^n times, could you >> get there? > > I don't think so. Even if it did a += rather than an =, you still have the > problem of a float not being big enough to hold 1024 weeks plus a few ms. > > >> Turns out guys have hacked the 2072 to turn it into a 2202 bandwidth et al. > > Is that a soldering iron change or just firmware? > > > > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
