On 09/02/2013 03:09 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > You probably are better off simply taking all the samples into your "smarts" > and handling things there rather than having the 5335 do it for you. Since > you are simply looking at data once a second (delta T between two 1 pps > signals) it's not a compute intensive setup. > > If you are trying to measure frequency with the 5335 rather than pps signals, > you have some other problems to deal with. The data rate is still very slow. > Even with this setup I would not play with the 5335 internal math, other than > to subtract the nominal frequency. The sole advantage there is having data > that's easier on the eyes. Also considering that the PRS-10 beats the 5335 with about 10 times better single-shot resolution.
Cheers, Magnus _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
