It is all a matter of proper placement, now I know you are expecting a tirade on propagation delay and antenna placement and cable length. But actually my thought is to place them far enough apart with the WWV clock in front of your and your GPS at a 12-15 degree angle so it takes 0.2 second to look from one to the other.
Thomas Knox > From: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk > To: time-nuts@febo.com > Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:22:04 +0100 > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] A man with two clocks... > > Among my time nut toys is a Consumer grade GPS clock and a similar WWVB > clock. The WWVB clock consistently runs about 0.2 seconds ahead of the GPS > one. I know no one can say why without knowing the particulars of the two > clock's circuits. Just thought I'd post it for what it's worth. > > Regards. > > Max. K 4 O DS. > =================================== > > Max, > > I see similar things here. I've always put it down to relatively poor > circuitry in the radio clock, which is why I built my NTP-controlled wall > clock! > > http://www.satsignal.eu/raspberry-pi/DigitalClock.html > > One radio clock is below. That particular MSF clock is actually not too > bad - visibly it's in sync with the NTP clock (which itself is within a few > microseconds of GPS time). > > 73, > David GM8ARV > -- > SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements > Web: http://www.satsignal.eu > Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
