Hi Jim, On 10/05/2013 04:52 PM, Jim Lux wrote: > On 10/5/13 3:44 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote: >>> And I want to do it quickly on a slow processor. >> ... and a simple high-pass filter won't do it for you? > > I suppose so..I'll have to fool with that. > A high pass filter would definitely take out the DC and linear terms, > but I'm not so sure about the exponential transient. > > (OTOH, as I look at more of the data, maybe I just lop off the first > chunk of data with some empirical knowledge) The transient will make it through the filter, and if you can waste the first bunch, a simple one or two-pole high-pass filter will cost you brilliantly little processing to reduce the linear trend to essentially nothing. >> Can you store all samples in memory and iterate over them? > > Yes.. it can be acausal. OK. Good. > It's sort of like looking at frequency or ADEV data, removing the > aging, and trying to see the fluctuations due to room temperature > variation. Ah. Then after the initial transient, all you want to do is estimate the drift term and remove it from your data. That's not too hard to do with a simple least square algorithm. I've also made variants of ADEV processing that accumulates values such that the linear drift can be taken out of the ADEV without re-iterating, but in that case the Hadamard does it too. When doing a least square you get frequency and drift parameters and can then get a reduced sample-set for ADEV and friends to chew on.
You only need to estimate the exponential decay if your samples are precious and you need to get those early samples. Cheers, Magnus _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
