> What kind of accuracy do the picket's have.   You can log pulses using the
> PPS system on bare PC hardware and get the time of the pulse logged to
> within about 2 uSec.  Simply connect the pulse to DCD line of a real serial
> port.
> 
> If you need better than 2 uSec then yes you need external hardware.

The current version of picPET is 400 ns resolution given a 10 MHz clock. It was 
designed for applications needing millisecond- to microsecond-level accuracy. 
Not bad for a $1 8-pin chip.

> If those pickets are much better than 2 uSec then they make a GREAT front
> end for a NTP server.  Question: how do you transfer accurate time into the
> PIC?

They are a form of T2D or TDC (time to digital converter) or TSC (continuous 
time-stamping counter) for making zero-dead time measurements, not real-time 
clocks for the purpose of maintaining time of day, or day or year.

If all you need is a 1PPS source use a GPS timing receiver, or a GPSDO with 1 
PPS output, or a 10 MHz external clock and a picDIV divider. See 
http://leapsecond.com/pic/ for many different dividers.

----

As far as NTP is concerned, I wonder if you've ever considered turning the 
tables on how it works. AFAIK, NTP gets an external time reference (e.g., 1PPS) 
as an interrupt. With modern computers, this is horrible. There are far too may 
layers of h/w jitter (pipelines, multiple levels of cache, TLB misses, etc.) 
and s/w jitter (interrupt handling, spinlocks, interrupt masking, priority 
levels, etc.).

For best timing, perhaps a better solution is not to have NTP receive a 1PPS as 
*input* and try to pretend to measure it internally in s/w but for NTP to 
*output* a 1PPS and measure that externally with sub-microsecond h/w (like a 
picPET).

That bypasses all the jitter associated with asynchronous events; replacing it 
instead with a synchronous event. If NTP takes an internal s/w timestamp before 
and after the pulse is output, and you obtain (via serial port) the timestamp 
reading made by external h/w you can then correct the NTP paper clock, with far 
less h/w and s/w jitter.

The mental shift is to stop treating a PC+NTP as a precise clock and pulse 
measurement instrument and start treating a PC+NTP as a precise clock and pulse 
generation instrument.

/tvb

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to