>One could try claiming that Loomis was the first to make detailed
>measurements of a Shortt, but it would take some digging to prove
>he was "first" and not just "one of the first".

Just FYI:

During my reading of BSTJ I noticed a reference to a paper by
Loomis and Marrington at bottom of p4:

        www3.alcatel-lucent.com/bstj/vol11-1932/articles/bstj11-2-318.pdf


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to