I wonder if a CSAC used as a wristwatch would need constant C-field adjustment?
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Attila Kinali <att...@kinali.ch> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:43:13 -0400 > Ronald Held <ronaldh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am curious what people think of this watch at least from the time-nut > POV. > > Considering that they are not the first, but at least the third with > that idea (see archives for other CSAC wrist watches). > > But seriously, a modern, temperature compensated quartz watch goes better > than +/-10s in half a year (about 1ppm), which is already about as good as > you > need for a wrist watch. Any better is just unnecessary overengineering. > Of course, it's a different matter if you like to show of to your peers. > > Other than that, i probably would buy a CSAC and put it into some equipment > instead. :-) > > Attila Kinali > > -- > I pity people who can't find laughter or at least some bit of amusement in > the little doings of the day. I believe I could find something ridiculous > even in the saddest moment, if necessary. It has nothing to do with being > superficial. It's a matter of joy in life. > -- Sophie Scholl > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.