I think OpenNTPD goes not try to be a stratum 1 server. It is not something you would connect a hardware reference clock to. Look at the man page for the .conf file.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Matthew Martin <dr.g...@gmail.com> wrote: > Greetings to the group! I just obtained a Rev C Beagleboard Black this > week, and the standard distribution does not include ntpd. When I check > for available ntpd related packages using the "aptitude" command, it offers > OpenBSD's openntpd as the one available ntpd package. > > A little bit of research on the OpenNTPD project suggests to me that it is > a lightweight ntpd implementation. They even suggest that if you are > looking for the ultimate accuracy you may not want to use OpenNTPD. > > Has anyone here actually used OpenNTPD, and perhaps made a comparison with > a more standard ntpd package? I get the feeling that I would be better off > with a standard ntpd. Does OpenNTPD even support PPS or the variety of > clock source drivers that standard ntpd supports? > > Thanks to the group for your help. > Matt > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.