On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Bob Stewart <b...@evoria.net> wrote:
> Hi Attila,
>
>
> Is wood, nails, and asphalt shingle really that big of a problem at these 
> frequencies?  The antenna is within 2 ft of the highest point of the roof.

Depends on what you call a "problem".  If you are getting a usable
signal then some people would not call it a problem.  When I moved my
GPS antenna from user the roof to a pole mounted above the roof the
signal improved greatly.  The most notable improvements was the signal
to noise ration of satellites near the horizon.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Attila Kinali <att...@kinali.ch>
> To: Bob Stewart <b...@evoria.net>; Discussion of precise time and frequency 
> measurement <time-nuts@febo.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 8:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?
>
>
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 16:38:42 -0700
>
>
>
> Bob Stewart <b...@evoria.net> wrote:
>
>>  Given that my antenna is just a puck at the peak of the attic (never got 
>> around to adding the DIY choke-ring)
>
> A choke ring will not help you much in the attic. You already have lots
> of reflecting and refracting surfaces/volumes above the antenna.
> Unless you get to the top of your roof, i wouldn't bother adding a choke ring.
>
>
>             Attila Kinali
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.



-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to