Hi Ok, we have a 15 pin connector, Pin 8 is the common ground between them.
Pins 1 - 7 cross over (in order) to pins 9-15. Pair End A End B A 1 9 B 2 10 C 3 11 D 4 12 E 5 13 F 6 14 G 7 15 Playing with pins 3 and 4 seems to get things going. That’s pairs C and D. Jumpers on some of the other pairs also seem to help the process. Pairs A and F do not seem to need jumpers in any of the configurations people have tried. (Yes I could very easily have missed something there). The rest of the box seems to be RS-422 differential signaling. We fake it out by driving it single ended for RS-232. Are any of these really differential pairs? One would expect the PPS to be differential. On the interface connectors it’s pretty easy to see. The input side has both pins idling at around 2.5V. The output side idles at 2.5V when disabled or at 1.5 on one and 3.5 on the other when enabled. Find a pair with 1.5 and 3.5 and you have a RS-422 link. The board only has a single dual UART chip on it. It looks like one full UART goes to the diag port full time. The other UART likely does multiple duty. The RX side looks at the output of the GPS full time. The TX side either sends setup commands to the GPS or puts out the time stamp / status message on the pps output connector. That’s got all the resources allocated. There really isn’t enough resource there to have the two boxes chat with each other via serial. The most they could be doing on the 15 pin connector is duplicating. what you are seeing on one of the other ports or GPS. The most simple solution would be for all of the pairs above to be DC signaling except for the PPS. Did they keep it that simple? Bob > On Nov 2, 2014, at 2:34 AM, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> > wrote: > > Oh well, as was said before, one of the biggest problems working on > something like this can be the watching and the waiting, but sometimes it > might > be worth the wait, and sometimes having a bit of luck thrown in along the > way can be quite handy too:-) > > As mentioned earlier, I'd implemented Arthur's circuit but left the fault > light connection as a flying lead to be switched manually. > Originally, after the unit started up with the fault light on, I found > that when the light eventually went out I had to switch this input to ground > to enable the outputs. > As a follow up though it did seem worth trying with this connection > grounded all along, just out of curiosity of course, and it also seemed to > start > up just fine like that:-) > > A quick look at the circuit showed that this left the wire to J5 pin 3 also > grounded all along and a question hanging over what was happening to J5 > pin 4. > In the static condition there's approx 1.5 volts across the 470 ohm > resistor but it would normally get pulsed at some time in the proceedings. > However, with the fault light connection permanently grounded it didn't look > like > this was going to be exactly hyper active either. > So the next step was to directly ground J5 pin 3 and for J5 pin 4 to be > grounded via the 470 ohm resistor, without knowing what was driving it from > inside the unit a direct short could have been asking for trouble, and to > dispense with the transistor circuit. > > And guess what, that worked too:-) > > So it would seem that whilst all the blinking of lights and assorted > handshaking and negotiating are necessary to sort out the status quo between > two > boxes, it might be a bit less complicated with just the one after all. > > By way of confirmation I wired up another Ref-1 unit, straight out of the > box and previously unused, powered it up, and left it to get on with it. > After the quick LED test sequence it started out with the "No GPS" and > "Fault" lights on permanently and the "STBY" and "ON" lights off. > Just about 75 minutes later the "No GPS" and "Fault" lights went out, the > "ON" light came on permanently, and we had 15MHz and 1PPS outputs from > that one too:-) > > One as yet unexplained difference between the two units is that the first > one performed in a similar fashion but the "ON" light was flashing from > shortly after the initial test sequence, even whilst the "No GPS" and > "Fault" > lights were still on, and it remained flashing after they went out, and so > far has never been on permanently at all. > I've since put that one back on test and it's still behaving in the same > way but still booting up ok just the same. > Whether this indicates some sort of fault condition in the first unit, > running just the bare board might have been asking for trouble, or some form > of randomness in behaviour such that these results aren't entirely > predictable, I don't know, but so far both seem to be consistent in their own > > fashion and two out of two isn't a bad start:-) > > It would be appreciated if others could try this too, confirmation that it > works elsewhere would be great, and knowing it was a pure fluke and never > to be repeated could be quite useful too:-) > > To recap, this is a Ref-1 unit with onboard GPS and what I'm doing is to > make the following connections to the J5 "Interface" connector, using a > small plug in breadboard as a temporary junction box..... > > Pins 2, 10, 12, and 15 of J5 are connected together but not connected to > anywhere else. > > Using a ground connection taken from J5 pin 8, J5 pin 3 is connected > directly to ground, and J5 pin 4 is connected to ground via a 470ohm > resistor, > again with no other connections. > > That's it, after power up and an appropriate delay, assuming my results are > repeatable, the outputs should be enabled and away we go. > > Uh oh, after writing the above it occurred to me as an afterthought that I > should probably also check what might happen if J5 pin 4 was disconnected > altogether, so I removed the 470ohm resistor from the original unit whilst > it was running and the voltage on pin 4 rose to just over 4.7 volts, the > "ON" light continued to flash..... > and the outputs remained enabled. > After that I just have to try it from start up, and also to try it on the > second unit too, who needs sleep anyway?:-) > > The first one did start up ok with J5 pin 4 disconnected and whilst > waiting for that to come live I've made up a plug adapter using an old VGA > patch > cable and now have the second one on test again and waiting to see what > happens this time. > > And there you have it, finally, the other one up and running again also:-) > > I happened to be watching this one this time as it went live and the "ON" > light flashed once before coming on permanently, perhaps not very > significant but just thought I'd mention it anyway. > > So that's it folks, after all this it would now seem that all that's > needed to enable a Ref-1 unit stand alone is to link together J5 pins 2, 10, > 12, > and 15, and to ground pin 3 to pin 8, and then just hang around for hours > and hours on end with yer fingers crossed:-) > I don't know if it's possible to monitor the J8 Diagnostic port whilst > waiting for it come live, that would at least give a better idea of what's > going on, but I deliberately avoided any other connections whilst trying > this > out so it's possible that might be inhibited also. > > Anyway, apologies for all the waffle, I've been topping this up as I go > along whilst surviving on coffee and getting a bit groggy in the process, > it's 0730 here now and no sleep yet, but once I'd had my first encouraging > results there was no way I could just go to bed and leave it:-) > > Regards > > Nigel > GM8PZR > > > > In a message dated 02/11/2014 02:00:23 GMT Standard Time, kb...@n1k.org > writes: > > Hi > > I’ve watched the two boxes fire up. They spend a bit of time blinking > lights on this one and then on that one. From watching the “dance”, I think > that the transistor delay circuit (or something like it) is indeed needed. > There are multiple ways the delay and sequencing could be implemented. A > cheap 5V PIC is certainly one way to do it. With no voltage coming out on > the > connector doing a purely external solution probably is going to require > external power. I think I’d at least bring that out on one of the many > unused > alarm pins. > > Bob > >> On Nov 1, 2014, at 9:52 PM, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts > <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Bob, >> >> I understand the consequences of not modifying the unit but, having done > so >> and having a REF-1 unit running stand alone, I was just commenting that > I >> wasn't sure whether or not it was necessary to implement all of > Arthur's >> modification in order to enable the basic functionality, or whether some > >> part of it might be purely to control the indicators. >> >> As a follow on from that I was wondering whether or not it might be >> possible to achieve a similar result, at least to the point of just > making it >> functional, just by cross linking some of the out and return paths, > "faking" >> it without the need for an additional powered interface if you like, > not for >> any other reason than it might then be possible to make a plug in >> modification that could be fitted without needing to open the box. >> >> Regards >> >> Nigel >> GM8PZR >> >> >> >> >> In a message dated 02/11/2014 00:19:57 GMT Standard Time, kb...@n1k.org > >> writes: >> >> Hi >> >> If you: >> >> 1) Do not have two units (Ref 0 and Ref 1) >> >> — and — >> >> 2) Do not “fake out” the slave detect (= use the mod) >> >> Then the unit you have will not: >> >> 1) Enable the pps out >> >> 2) Enable the 15 MHz out >> >> It will try to disciple the OCXO, but you won’t be able to see any > result >> of that. >> >> Bob >> >> >>> On Nov 1, 2014, at 7:05 PM, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts >> <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Anthony, >>> >>> It's a new circuit that has to be inserted, which is what I've done, > but >> >>> I'm not sure whether or not it's strictly necessary for the unit to >> function >>> or whether it's just there to get the lights sequencing properly and >>> perhaps all that's needed for basic functionality are just the links. >>> >>> I'm leaving well alone for now to let the oscillator run overnight but > >>> will try it again tomorrow with just the links and see what happens. >>> I'm also hoping to get some idea of the between unit signalling, >> although >>> I only have Z3811s I'm hoping, with the boards being an almost >> identical >>> match, that what goes one way should be matched by what comes the > other. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Nigel >>> GM8PZR >>> >>> >>> >>> In a message dated 01/11/2014 22:41:09 GMT Standard Time, >> ar...@antamy.com >>> writes: >>> >>> I wasn't clear from the photo whether the circuit was a > representation >> of >>> what is on the board, and you just had to connect the pins listed >> together, >>> or whether this was a new circuit that had to be inserted. Sounds > like >>> the latter? >>> >>> Anthony >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of >>> GandalfG8--- via time-nuts >>> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 4:04 PM >>> To: time-nuts@febo.com >>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Lucent KS-24361, HP/Symmetricom Z3809A, >> Z3810A, >>> Z3811A, Z3812... >>> >>> Well, I'm happy to report that Arthur's modification does do the > trick, >>> although I don't know why as I don't have any data for the interface >> as yet. >>> I daren't disturb the 15 pin connector right now as this Z3811A PCB > is >> >>> still out of its case and connected to a breadboard with wires just >> pushed >>> into the sockets, and for the same reason I don't have any computer >>> connection at the moment either. >>> >>> My implementation isn't quite as described, in that I've not made a >>> connection to the fault LED but am just manually pulling that input >> high and low >>> on the breadboard with another wire link as required. >>> Whether or not this is part or all of the reason that my green "on" >> light >>> is flashing rather than steady I don't know, but I am seeing the 1PPS >> and >>> 15MHz outputs and the 15MHz looks to be conditioning ok. >>> >>> Aside from the 5 volt supply, which I'm picking off from pin 5 of the >>> header between u33 and U34, and the aforementioned fault LED >> connection, all >>> the other connections can be made to J5 externally and could be > housed >> in a >>> 15 way shell along with the switching circuits. >>> >>> I'm still hopeful that some cross linking of the right pairs might >>> achieve the same result without the extra circuitry, so "all" that >> needs to be >>> done now is just to identify the right pairs:-) >>> >>> At least with it up and running it should be easier to check out some > >> of >>> the inter-unit signalling. >>> >>> Thanks Arthur, your efforts are much appreciated. >>> >>> regards >>> >>> Nigel >>> GM8PZR >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> In a message dated 01/11/2014 15:25:02 GMT Standard Time, >> ar...@antamy.com >>> writes: >>> >>> For those who missed it, Arthur's post is at >>> https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2010-June/047825.html and > the >> photo is at >>> >> > http://i906.photobucket.com/albums/ac262/rjb1998/RFTG-uREF1photo1_zps87c505ca.jpg >>> >>> Anthony >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of >> Arthur >>> Dent >>> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 9:20 PM >>> To: time-nuts@febo.com >>> Subject: [time-nuts] Lucent KS-24361, HP/Symmetricom Z3809A, > Z3810A, >>> Z3811A, Z3812A GPSDO system >>> >>> Bob Stewart bob at evoria.net >>> ?? ? I have both of my units sitting on the bench. I found that I >> needed >>> to connect them together to get the REF1 unit to come out of standby > ? >> . ?? >>> >>> Bob Camp kb8tq at n1k.org >>> ??I suspect that somebody will have to figure out what the 15 pin >>> connector / jumper is doing. On previous RFTG units there was a way > to >> re-wire >>> the crossover interface to fake out the slave detect process. That >> would let >>> you run a single GPS equipped box and have it behave correctly. >> Without >>> the fake wires trick none of them played nice without the slave > being >>> present ? >>> . ?? >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> Reposting what I had posted over a week ago, in case you missed it ? > . >>> >>> Arthur Dent golgarfrincham at gmail.com Wed Oct 22 13:59:48 EDT 2014 > >> ?? >>> ? >>> Way back on Fri Jun 11 16:48:43 UTC 2010 I posted about using one of >>> these units I had modified but at the time there wasn't a single > person >> who >>> was interested. I have been using the RFTG-u REF1 since then and it > is >> a >>> nice unit. The modifications I added (including a power supply -see >> photo) >>> allows the lights to cycle through their normal sequence on warm-up >> and the >>> second unit isn't needed at all ? . ?? >>> >>> -Arthur >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.