> **  I'm assuming that the GPS does not use the OCXO output for its 
> own timing.  That is such a good idea, I can't understand why more 
> designers don't do it.

It adds to the cost. If the end-user only needs XO or TCXO quality timing, 
there's no incentive to increase the size and cost and power of the GPSDO 
product with a OCXO.

But, you're right, it *is* a really good idea, and of course we all know the 
Trimble Thunderbolt does it this way. One reason why it's always the #1 
favorite GPSDO among time nuts.

Note that most high-end GNSS timing receivers go one better and simply have an 
external input for the clock. That way you feed your own lab clock into the 
receiver. If you have Rb/Cs/maser you would use that as the reference. It's 
what the national timing labs do, along with dual-frequency and post-processing 
and all the other tricks of the trade.

/tvb
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to