Hi Scott, That's a nice WWVB result. Yes, the triple marker pulse looks is correct for a positive leap second. What did you use for a receiver?
My efforts were modest this year. iPhone screen capture of time.gov using pacific daylight time instead of the usual UTC: http://leapsecond.com/images/2015-leapsecond-time-gov.png Nixie leap second clock (designed to be right once every few years): http://leapsecond.com/images/CD47-235960.jpg /tvb ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Newell" <newell+timen...@n5tnl.com> To: <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 5:24 PM Subject: [time-nuts] Leap second results: WWVB > My linux parallel port WWVB 'scope got a bit confused at the leap second: ... > Tue Jun 30 23:59:57 2015 | ------------------------- | 1 > Tue Jun 30 23:59:58 2015 | ------------------------- | 1 > Tue Jun 30 23:59:59 2015 | ---------------------------------------- | X > Wed Jul 1 00:00:00 2015 | ---------------------------------------- | X > Wed Jul 1 00:00:00 2015 | ---------------------------------------- | X > Wed Jul 1 00:00:01 2015 | ----------- | 0 > Wed Jul 1 00:00:02 2015 | ---------- | 0 _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.