Poul-Henning, The reason to stay with the LORAN C style pulses is very very simple. It allows our time-nuts Austrons and SRS to work. Its the only way I get any of my tax dollars back. :-) The good news is no official government person reads time-nuts. Regards Paul
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > -------- > In message <55a4ac81.1030...@rubidium.dyndns.org>, Magnus Danielson > writes: > > >The safety is > >relative, in that it takes quite a bit of more infrastructure compared > >to the jamming of GPS, and that lies in the wavelength of the signal > >than anything else. > > If the goal is a reliable backup for GPS, there are smarter ways to > use the 100kHz band than Loran-C pulses, and there really isn't much > reason to stay compatible with Loran-C receivers. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
