Hi If you take more data (rate is faster) the noise floor of the data set at 1 second goes down as square root N. (speeds up 10X, noise down by ~1/3)
Past a point, the resultant plot is not messed up by the process involved in the sampling. Bob > On Jul 31, 2015, at 9:26 PM, Daniel Mendes <dmend...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ok... time to show my lack of knowledge in public and ask a very simple > question: > > Can someone explain in very simple terms what this graph means? > > My current interpretation is as following: > > "For a 100Hz input, if you look to your signal in 0.1s intervals, thereĀ“s > about 1.0e-11 frequency error on average (RMS average?)" > > How far from the truth am I? > > Daniel > > > > Em 31/07/2015 18:04, Poul-Henning Kamp escreveu: >> -------- >> >>> If you look at the attached plot there are four datasets. >> And of course... >> >> Here it is: >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.