For navigation more measurements have always been prefered - that is use as 
many GNSS systems as all your receicers support.

That should be true also for common view timing.

--
       Björn

<div>-------- Originalmeddelande --------</div><div>Från: Bob Camp 
<kb...@n1k.org> </div><div>Datum:2016-04-07  18:41  (GMT+07:00) 
</div><div>Till: Bob Stewart <b...@evoria.net>, Discussion of precise time and 
frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> </div><div>Rubrik: Re: [time-nuts] 
LEA-M8T </div><div>
</div>Hi

Indeed, if you have not turned off the other systems for timing, you will have 
issues. Even for 
precision navigation, you need to turn them off. Until the European system goes 
up, there will 
not ba a coordinated approach between any two of the systems. Right now they 
each make their
own assumptions and their own definitions. If you are driving a car down the 
road, that’s not a 
big deal. If you are trying to do TimeNuts stuff … A one meter delta is a big 
deal for timing. A “few”
nanoseconds (say >10) is also a big deal. 

Bob


> On Apr 6, 2016, at 9:39 PM, Bob Stewart <b...@evoria.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Logan,
> 
> I seem to remember Bob Camp mentioning that you can't have multiple satellite 
> sources in the mix, because the other satellites are inferior to the GPS sats 
> in timing.  Maybe Bob or someone could address this.  I would love to 
> discover that I've set something wrong in all the many, many data structures.
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------
> On Wed, 4/6/16, Logan Cummings <logan.cummi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] LEA-M8T
> To: "Bob Stewart" <b...@evoria.net>, "Discussion of precise time and 
> frequency measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 6, 2016, 8:18 PM
> 
> Hi
> Bob, 
>     Can't speak to
> jitter accuracy but the M8 series is definitely not the same
> receiver in the 6 series. As you probably know, M8
> introduced multi-GNSS support so in addition to GPS you have
> Beidou and Glonass satellites.    
>       At work we've had some gnashing of
> teeth about the wider filter passband requirements for
> multi-GNSS support since we're operating in a noisy
> environment, but I have nothing further on degraded
> performance when using only GPS.
>      Would be interesting to let
> it have all the constellations and see what
> happens.
> -Logan
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at
> 10:04 AM, Bob Stewart <b...@evoria.net>
> wrote:
> I
> recently bought a number of LEA-M8T receivers and I have to
> say that I am unimpressed, so far.  They don't survey
> to the same reported accuracy as the LEA-6T in the same
> amount of time.  They certainly aren't better in the
> jitter after sawtooth correction.  So, have I managed to
> overlook some new field, or are they just not the same
> receiver as the 6T?  I did shut all sats off except GPS
> sats.
> 
> 
> 
> Bob - AE6RV
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> 
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> 
> and follow the instructions there.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to