I think all RG6 cable has a solid core otherwise the F type connector wouldn't work.

I almost universally use an RG6 type cable for all my receive only systems.

In fact, I came across several hundred feet of a Belden product labled 1694A HD-SDI Precision Video Cable 4.5GHz. This has a solid copper center, foil shield and on top of that a copper braid shield. This Belden cable has, at least in the comparison of Belden vs other's data sheets, a wee bit better performance.

So far has been working very for me whenever I use it. I have one symetricom "puck" antenna mounted just outside on the deck I use for testing using about 50 feet of this cable and works well.

And just to show how not overly critical cable is, my main GPS antenna mounted up on the roof just above the peak is a "bullet" type (MaxRad TMG-26N - 26db gain) which feeds my lab through 65 feet of RG-8X cable which what I had lying around at the time with the good intention of replacing with "better" cable later in the summer. I have since moved my lab around and have extended that 65 feet of RG-8X with an additional 25 feet of RG-58 to a Symetricom 58535A one to two splitter (which has some gain as well). The connection between the connection between the RG-8X and RG-58 is made with a crimp on male BNC on one side and a crimp on female on the other to eliminate using two male and one barrel connector.

Good intentions being as they may, the RG-8X and RG-58 extension has worked so well that I have never bothered changing it out and that is now going on six years. When it needs changing out I will replace with quality RG6.

Like many things in life there is a sense of accomplishment and pleasure in tweaking something out to it's utmost; likewise there is also a sense of accomplishment and pleasure is making do with whats available and still getting to where you want to get. It all depends on which cup you wish to drink from.


cheers, Graham ve3gtc



On 2016-04-22 21:38, Bob Stewart wrote:
Hi Ryan,

For the few years I've been on time-nuts, I understood the consensus view to be to get a good 
quality RG-6QS satellite cable.  A few of the posts in this thread have made me wonder if the 
consensus is changing, or if it's just too much trouble to stand up to the crowd.  I've got about 
300 ft of CerroWire RG-6QS leftover from Home Depot in the garage.  I looked at the datasheet, and 
it's confusing.  For the attenuation at 1000MHz, they list 21.45DB per hundred with the superscript 
"1".  However there is nothing on the page noting whether that "1" means per 
100 feet or per 100 meters.  Looking at the competition it would appear that that's per meter.  
Unfortunately, I don't have the right connectors to hook it up to my SA to see.  OTOH, 100 ft runs 
from this spool don't show any noticeable (i.e. problematic) attenuation of the signal.  Maybe 
someone else with a spool of RG-6 in the garage could give use some real world attenuation figures 
at L1?

But, rather than over-engineering or over-angsting this issue, it's probably OK 
to just pick one and use it.  It's not likely to make any real difference 
unless you have a run in the many hundreds of feet.

Bob - AE6RV

--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 4/22/16, Ryan Stasel <rsta...@uoregon.edu> wrote:

  Subject: Re: [time-nuts] RG6 or LMR400 for GPS Antenna (Symmetricom 58532A    
and T-bolt)
  To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" 
<time-nuts@febo.com>
  Date: Friday, April 22, 2016, 4:09 PM
Paul, LOL! So, along those lines…
  one other question, since I can’t find my belden, I’ll
  be buying some coax. Anyone have any opinions about RG6 for
  CCTV vs CATV? My understanding is the CCTV version always
  has a solid copper center conductor (which in my mind would
  mean less voltage loss for the DC power going to the
  antenna), or I’m still overthinking it and should just go
  with standard RG6?
Thanks! -Ryan Stasel > On Apr 21, 2016, at 13:04
  , paul swed <paulsw...@gmail.com>
  wrote:
  >
  > Ryan a
  slight heads up.
  > Time Nuts is not about
  time accuracy as many people assume.
  >
  Its actually about the time we all waste looking for what we
  know we have.
  > We just measure that time
  accurately.
  > I do not use anti seize.
  Nothing against it just one more glob of stuff to
  > deal with.
  > If you use
  the heat shrink and it seals your done for my 2 cents.
  > Paul
  > WB8TSL
  >
  > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016
  at 1:07 PM, Ryan Stasel <rsta...@uoregon.edu>
  wrote:
  >
  >>
  All,
  >>
  >>
  Really awesome answers, thanks!
  >>
  >> For the sealing question, it was more
  of a “should I bother with something
  >> like anti-seize” or the like on the
  actual thread-thread N interface. The
  >> actual connector crimp, was planning
  on just using a couple layers of the
  >> heat-shrink with adhesive. That is all
  going to be internal to the mast
  >>
  anyway, so direct weather contact should be minimal. It’s
  also on the side
  >> of my chimney,
  that gets very little to no direct sun, so UV exposure
  >> should be minimal. But good note on
  that regard.
  >>
  >> Pete, thank you very much for the info
  wrt the antenna and amp, and also
  >>
  the fact the Trimble starter kit came with RG6. I’m going
  to see what my
  >> seller wants for
  LMR400, but otherwise, I’ll just use RG6. It’s
  certainly
  >> easier to handle. I did
  find some datasheets on the stuff that Home despot
  >> (har har) sells (Southwire (
  >> 
http://www.southwire.com/ProductCatalog/XTEInterfaceServlet?contentKey=prodcatsheetOEM80)).
  >> I swear I have a box of Belden
  somewhere, but I can’t seem to find it.
  >>
  >> Thanks
  again!
  >>
  >>
  -Ryan Stasel
  >>
  >>> On Apr 21, 2016, at 06:02 , paul
  swed <paulsw...@gmail.com>
  wrote:
  >>>
  >>> With respect to sealing. Everyone
  has a method.
  >>> I use what I
  learned in the Navy. I could see how well the connections
  >> held
  >>> up
  in the worst conditions sun cold heat wet humidity...
  >>> Layer of rubber tape
  >>> scotch kote
  >>> Layer of plastic tape
  >>> scotch kote
  >>> If done well the connector
  releases just fine even after 5 or more
  >> years. I
  >>>
  want to say 10. But then woodpeckers have a way of
  shortening the life of
  >>>
  connectors and coax.
  >>> The
  approach is really layers and the top to deteriorate over
  time...
  >>> But as I say everyone
  has their own approach.
  >>>
  Regards
  >>> Paul
  >>> WB8TSL
  >>>
  >>> On
  Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Ryan Stasel <rsta...@uoregon.edu>
  >> wrote:
  >>>
>>>> Bob/Paul,
  >>>>
  >>>> Thanks. And there's the
  rub... Who knows what the specs are on
  "generic"
  >>>> RG6 QS.
  I'll see what my seller wants for their LMR400, but
  otherwise
  >> yeah,
  >>>> RG6 is just easier. I have
  both compression and crimp connectors for it,
  >>>> including some RG6
  N-connectors (yeah, they're probably for LMR300, but
  >>>> they work).
  >>>>
  >>>> Other question: any tips for
  the exterior N connection? I can
  >>>> "weatherproof" the
  actual cable-connector crimp, but I'm curious if
  >> anyone
  >>>> bothers to "lube"
  the N connector to keep moisture from otherwise
  >> seizing
  >>>> it up.
  >>>>
  >>>> Thanks!
  >>>>
  >>>> Ryan Stasel
  >>>> IT Operations Manager, SOJC
  >>>> University of Oregon
  >>>>
  >>>> Sent from my iPhone
  >>>>
  >>>>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 17:00,
  Bob Camp <kb...@n1k.org>
  wrote:
  >>>>>
  >>>>> Hi
  >>>>>
  >>>>> RG-6 Quad Shield should be
  fine as long as it’s meeting the published
  >>>> specs. The advantage of
  LRM-400 is that you likely *know* where it came
  >>>> from and what the specs
  are.
  >>>>>
  >>>>> If you decide to split the
  antenna between GPSDO’s, a powered splitter
  >>>> is a really good idea. Each
  time you split another 2 ways, you loose 3
  >> db.
  >>>>
  Get at least a 4 way splitter ….
  >>>>>
  >>>>> Bob
  >>>>>
  >>>>>> On Apr 20, 2016, at
  4:41 PM, Ryan Stasel <rsta...@uoregon.edu>
  wrote:
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> All,
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> I’m going to be
  installing a “permanent” antenna at home, and will
  >> need
  >>>>
  a run of about 100ft to get from my workstation, to the mast
  I’ll be
  >>>> mounting the
  antenna on (Symmetricom 58532A). I’ve seen some
  indication
  >>>> that both the
  antenna and the Trimble Thunderbolt won’t have any
  issues
  >>>> with running over
  75ohm cable, but thought I’d ask the “experts”
  whether
  >>>> I’d be better off
  with some RG6 Quad-shield, or LMR400 (I’ve got a local
  >>>> source that doesn’t know
  what LMR400 is, or what it’s worth)?
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Obviously I’d prefer
  to run and crimp RG6, but if I’d be better off
  >>>> with LMR400, I’d rather run
  that now than go back into the crawlspace
  >>>> again. =)
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Also, if it helps,
  I’ll probably have a Symmetricom/HP 58516A at/near
  >>>> the T-bolt so I can experiment
  with other GPS(DO)s as well (especially
  >> one
  >>>>
  of the JRMiller boards I bought and built (but never
  finished) ages
  >> ago).
  >>>> Which brings the question,
  will the T-bolt provide the oomph needed to
  >>>> power that splitter and the
  antenna over that length of cable?
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Thanks!
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> -Ryan Stasel
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  _______________________________________________
  >>>>>> time-nuts mailing list
  -- time-nuts@febo.com
  >>>>>> To unsubscribe, go
  to
  >>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  >>>>>> and follow the
  instructions there.
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  _______________________________________________
  >>>>> time-nuts mailing list --
  time-nuts@febo.com
  >>>>> To unsubscribe, go to
  >>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  >>>>> and follow the
  instructions there.
  >>>>
  _______________________________________________
  >>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  >>>> To unsubscribe, go to
  >>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  >>>> and follow the instructions
  there.
  >>>>
  >>>
  _______________________________________________
  >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  >>> To unsubscribe, go to
  >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  >>> and follow the instructions
  there.
  >>
  >>
  _______________________________________________
  >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  >> To unsubscribe, go to
  >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  >> and follow the instructions there.
  >>
  >
  _______________________________________________
  > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  > To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  > and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to