Lars wrote: >> What puzzles me is the large hump upwards in DACvalue. Anyone knows what is >> the reason?
Hal wrote: >My guess is poor filtering on the initial data when coming out of holdover, >probably complicated by inadequate testing and/or that case not being >important. > >I'm pretty sure there is at least one GPS data sheet that says to ignore the >first 3 samples. But the large hump and small jump seems to come more than 15 minutes after holdover and at the same time after both holdovers. The first part after the holdover seems to be normal for a PI-loop is my assumption but the hump and jumps are not. Lars _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
