-------- In message <b94f51f5-8498-1710-56b7-b1dd0e062...@earthlink.net>, jimlux writes: >On 5/15/16 1:12 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> -------- >> In message <jh7fjbpcfb612319v9cq8u0blrus9ec...@4ax.com>, David writes: >> >>> Commercial use also includes using the patent in production in some >>> way outside of selling an item which uses the patent. >> >> The Supreme Court recently limited that significantly, buy reiterating >> that you had to perform _all_ steps of a patent to infringe it: >> >> http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-786_664d.pdf >> >Bear in mind that not all the steps have to be performed by one entity >for infringement to exist.
Did you read the opinion ? I'm asking because it pretty much says the exact opposite... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
