That's true, Dick, although we had some guys who were very fast with
straight keys. And some of us who despised bugs...and still do.


On Wednesday, June 22, 2016, Richard W. Solomon <w1...@earthlink.net> wrote:

> Back before Iambic Paddles and Computer Keyers, the Vibroplex Bug
> (or some copy cat version) was the key of choice.
>
> You could ID Operators by what they called ..."swing"... , the
> spacing between Dots and Dashes.
>
> 73, Dick, W1KSZ
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com <javascript:;>] On
> Behalf Of William H. Fite
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 6:54 AM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Measuring receiver...
>
> I was a newbie at the very tail end of commercial telegraphy but the old
> guys spoke of operators who "sent with an accent" and one apparently
> memorable employee who "stammered."
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 22, 2016, Bob Camp <kb...@n1k.org <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Based on what I have read, at least at the start of WWII, the
> > recognition was all done by ear. The operator rather than the
> > transmitter was the key. The gear to do much else simply was not out
> > in the field.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
> > > On Jun 21, 2016, at 9:01 PM, William H. Fite <omni...@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > In the days of my misspent youth, I worked as a telegrapher (one of
> > > the very last) for a Norwegian shipping line. We sent and received
> > > both Norwegian and English though few of us were bilingual. Between
> > > ships and shore stations, there were about forty of us and we all
> > > could recognize each other's "fists" with near-perfect accuracy.
> > > This is not difficult, gentlemen, and does not require any esoteric
> signal analysis.
> > Transmitters
> > > would be a different story.
> > >
> > > Bill KJ4SLP
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, June 21, 2016, John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I've seen references that at least by the latter part of WW2
> > oscillographs
> > >> were being used to identify transmitters and/or ops.  It should be
> > possible
> > >> to deduce chirp, rise time, fall time of signals, all of which
> > characterize
> > >> the transmitter, as well as element spacing and other
> > >> characteristics
> > that
> > >> help identify the operator, from oscilloscope snapshots of the
> > demodulated
> > >> audio at various sweep speeds.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On Jun 21, 2016, at 7:02 PM, Alan Melia <alan.me...@btinternet.com
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>
> > >> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> TX "fingerprinting" in WWII
> > >>> You seem to be forgetting that there were very few of the
> > >>> sophisticated
> > >> digital timing systems were available 75 years ago. Traffic
> > >> analysis was started early in 1938 or even before. By 1939 we knew
> > >> all the nets used
> > in
> > >> Europe and had "Y" ( a corruption of WI, Wireless Intercept
> > >> )operators monitoring the nets. Many of these were amateurs and
> > >> they were
> > allocated to
> > >> specific nets and followed them around as they moved. They became
> > >> very familiar with the "accents" of operators on their nets, and
> > >> particularly before 1939 security procedures were very lax and
> "chatting"
> > >> common-place.....but it was all aural.
> > >>>
> > >>> I suspect serious transmitter parameter logging was not done
> > >>> before the
> > >> cold war when spectrum analysers, or at least pan-adapters became
> > >> more readily available. To keep a little OnTopic .....you would
> > >> have
> > difficulty
> > >> doing this with a BC-221.!! :-)) A crystal clock of this period was
> > >> at least one fully utilised 6foot 19inch rack (there is one at
> > >> Grenwich.)
> > >>> Alan
> > >>> G3NYK
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Alan
> > >>> G3NYK
> > >>>
> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "jimlux" <jim...@earthlink.net
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>
> > >> <javascript:;>>
> > >>> To: <time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> > >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 10:02 PM
> > >>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Measuring receiver...
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>> On 6/21/16 11:28 AM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
> > >>>>> Hi:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> During W.W.II there were secret methods of "fingerprinting"
> > >>>>> radio transmitters and separately the operators.
> > >>>>> I suspect the transmitter fingerprinting involved things like
> > frequency
> > >>>>> accuracy, stability, CW rise and decay time, &Etc. For the
> > >>>>> operator
> > >> some
> > >>>>> from of statistics on the timings associated with sending Morse
> Code.
> > >>>>> But. . .  I haven't seen any papers describing this.  Can anyone
> > point
> > >>>>> me to a paper on this?
> > >>>> For "human controlled" stuff, e.g. recognizing someone's "fist",
> > >> there's a huge literature out there on biometric identification
> > >> looking
> > at
> > >> things like keyboard and mouse click timing - the timing
> > >> requirements
> > are
> > >> pretty slack, and hardly time-nuts level, unless you're looking to
> > >> do it with mechanical devices constructed from spare twigs and
> > >> strands of
> > kelp.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> There have been a variety of schemes for recognizing individual
> > >>>> radios
> > >> by looking at the frequency vs time as they start up. Likewise,
> > >> it's
> > pretty
> > >> easy to distinguish radar magnetrons from each other.  Not a lot of
> > papers
> > >> about this, but you'll see it in advertising literature, or
> > occasionally in
> > >> conference pubs (although I can't think of any off hand).  There
> > >> was someone selling a repeater access control system that was based
> > >> on the transmitter fingerprint.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But the real reason why you don't see any publications is that
> > >>>> this
> > >> stuff is pretty classic signals intelligence (SIGINT or MASINT) and
> > >> it
> > is
> > >> still being used, and is all classified. You're not relying on
> > >> Betty the receiver operator to recognize the characteristic chirp
> > >> as the agent's radio is keyed, it's all done by computer now, but
> > >> the basic idea is the same.  And as with most of this stuff, the
> > >> basics are well known, but
> > the
> > >> practical details are not, or, at least, are the proprietary secret
> > sauce
> > >> in any practical system. (In a significant understatement, Dixon,
> > >> in "Spread Spectrum Systems" makes some comment about how synch
> > acquisition is
> > >> the difficult part and won't be described in the book)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You might look at the unclassified proceedings of conferences
> > >>>> like
> > >> MILCOM and find something.  Googling with MASINT might also help.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, go to
> > >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > >>>> and follow the instructions there.
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>
> > >>> To unsubscribe, go to
> > >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > >>> and follow the instructions there.
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>
> > >> To unsubscribe, go to
> > >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > >> and follow the instructions there.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > I am Pulse. Unbreakable.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;> To
> > > unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;> To
> > unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
>
>
> --
> I am Pulse. Unbreakable.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;> To
> unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>


-- 
I am Pulse. Unbreakable.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to