nsa...@kfu.com said: > Yes, thatâs true. Given the facilities I have available with the present > hardware, I donât believe I have much choice. I am not confident that I > could tell the difference between noise in the phase detection system and > PPS jitter variations that small. If the PA6H receiver gave sawtooth > corrections, Iâd be able to do better.
It would be interesting to look at the data to see if you can find the sort of pattern that a sawtooth correction would help and where a hanging bridge might cause confusion. If the bridge isn't hanging, the data samples should be spread over a range that is the clock period of the GPS unit. Round that up to 100 ns. I doubt if you will see that with a PC. On the other hand, you can get the same sort of pattern with a PPS over USB. That would be a ms wide and easy for a PC to get time stamps much finer grained than that. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.
_______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
